Sadrists shun Iraq front-runners

Al-Jaafari was Iraq's prime minister 2005-2006 and won 24% of the Sadrists referendum [AFP] Followers of Moqtada al-Sadr, an influential...


Al-Jaafari was Iraq's prime minister 2005-2006 and won 24% of the Sadrists referendum [AFP]

Followers of Moqtada al-Sadr, an influential Shia leader of Iraq, have chosen Ibrahim al-Jaafari as their preferred candidate to become the country's next prime minister.

Results from last week's referendum that the Sadrists held showed al-Jaafari, a former prime minister, ahead of other front runners like Nouri al-Maliki, the incumbent PM, and Iyad Allawi, another ex-premier.

According to results obtained by Al Jazeera, al-Jaafari won 24 per cent of the vote, while al-Maliki got 10 per cent and Allawi secured nine per cent.

Jafaar al-Sadr, a cousin of the Shia leader who was on the ballot, secured 23 per cent of the 1.8 million ballots cast. Ahmad Chalabi, a member of the Iraqi National Alliance, got nine per cent.

Muqtada al-Sadr told Al Jazeera that he had turned down a recent offer by Daawa party that offered the release of his followers denaited by al-Maliki's government, in return for accepting an alliance with the state of Law coalition.

Al-Sadr sharply criticised al-Maliki and described his government as a failure.

"The new Iraqi government should be based on partnership, not on partisan, ethnic or sectarian bases," al-Sadr said in an interview with Al Jazeera.

Kingmaker

Though bereft of any legal authority, the two-day referendum was held after al-Sadr emerged as a kingmaker following Iraq's recently held national elections.

Zeina Khodr, Al Jazeera's correspondent in Baghdad, said: "They [Sadrists] have made the announcement, their choice is Ibrahim al-Jaafari...

"Sardist movement said they would abide by the choice of the people, which means more political uncertainty."

SPECIAL REPORT
View Al Jazeera's in depth coverage of the Iraqi election

The referendum results would contribute to more ambiguity to the Iraqi political scene which has been marred by the interpretation of the constitution regarding who should name the prime minister - the bloc which won more votes in the ballots or the one which govern the biggest number of seats in the parliament.

The results were a big disappointment for both Allawi and al-Maliki who wished to win the support of al-Sadr.

Final results in Iraq's March 7 elections gave the Allawi-led Iraqiya coalition just two seats more than State of Law bloc led by al-Maliki.

Shrewd move

The Sadrists won at least 39 seats in the 325-seat parliament making them the largest group within the Iraqi National Alliance (INA), a Shia coalition that placed third in the race.

Although the ballot was nominally open to all Iraqis, the vast majority of voters are likely to have been Sadrist backers.

The referendum was widely seen as a way for the Sadrist bloc, whose 30-something leader has been in Iran for about two years, to avoid giving its backing to al-Maliki.

"With this referendum, the Sadrists have made a shrewd move to put pressure on the other political parties," Hamid Fadhel, a Baghdad University political science professor, said.

"The negotiations with State of Law have stalled and the Sadrists want to push for someone other than Nouri al-Maliki [as premier], armed with popular support.

The Sadrists were key supporters when al-Maliki formed his government in 2006.

But two years later, he turned the security forces on the Mahdi Army, the movement's armed wing, jailing thousands of al-Sadr supporters in a campaign to destroy militias in the southern city of Basra and the Baghdad suburb of Sadr City.

Post a Comment

emo-but-icon

Connect

Translate

Search

Reading...

Read...

Topics

Absolute Immunity Abuse of Power Aggression All Apartheid Arbitrary Detention Assassinations Atrocities Attacks on Cultural Property Buried Under the Rubble Burned Alive children rights Civil Rights Coerced Confession Collective Punishment Colonialism Concentration Camps Conflict Courts and Human Rights Crime of Aggression Crimes Crimes Against Humanity Cruel and inhuman treatment Cultural Rights Death Penalty Detention Discrimination Disproportionate Attacks Dissent Education Ethnic Cleansing Executions Exploitation Extermination Extrajudicial Killing Famine Fiqh Food Forcible Transfer Freedom of Speech Gaza Gaza Body Count Gaza Genocide Geneva Conventions Genocide Guantanamo Health Hostage Taking human rights Human Shields Hunger HUQUQ ICC ICJ Incarceration Indigenous Indiscriminate Attacks International Humanitarian Law Islamic Law Journalism Massacres Media Bias Migration Murder Muslims Nakba Namibia Genocide Nationalism Noncombatant Immunity Occupation Palestine Pillaging Plunder Polical Prisoners Policing Political Rights Poverty POWs Prison System Proxy Wars Qualified Immunity Rebellion and Revolutions religion and conflict Remediation Reparation Reports Resistance Rights Rohingya Genocide sanctions Sectarianism Security Sexual Exploitation Sexual Violence Sharia Slavery Sovereign Immunity Starvation State Violence Summary Executions Supremacism The Battle of Algiers Torture UN UNINED NATIONS Universal Rights UNSC War Crimes WMDs Women Rights Zionism ألتكفير الإبادة الجماعية التحريض على الكراهية السجن التعسفي جرائم الحرب حقوق كرامة

Support space

KARAMA in the news

News stories from around the world (third-party content)

Human Rights News

Sponsors' Space

HUQUQ Journal (external)

KARAMA Pageviews

Ad Space

ShareThis

item
- Navigation -